Who Is It Really About?
January 25th, 2012I’ve been reading and hearing a lot about students getting injured in yoga class due to verbal adjustments from teachers. There is one very specific argument I encounter pretty regularly about the positioning of the hips in certain standing poses such as triangle, warrior 2 and side angle pose. One school of thought is to square the hips to the side of the room so that they are “open.” The other school of thought is that the hips be canted slightly forward to accommodate hip joints that maybe aren’t that open… yet.
I was always taught to square the hips to the side of the room. I practiced this way for years and wondered why my hips wouldn’t open, and why I would sometimes have SI joint pain or knee pain. There seem to be two radically different schools of thought here: one is to shove the body into the ‘final’ version of the pose, despite whether your hips are open or not, and the other is to approach the pose according to where the body is at the present moment. Looks vs. integrity.
Regardless of where one stands in this argument, I believe the greater question is, “What serves each student best?” Since yoga literally means ‘to yoke’ or ‘to unite,’ I constantly ask myself, as a teacher, “How can my student feel the most connected to their body?”
I just recently saw the movie Moneyball and loved it. I dare say I shall be putting it and this year’s The Help up in my list of all time favorite movies. I am impassioned about cheering for the underdog, stepping out of the status quo, slaying the impossible. (Hence my involvement in GoHuman.)
Moneyball is the true story of Oakland A’s general manager Billy Beane’s attempt to put together a successful and winning baseball team on a low budget. He and the rest of his management team had been taking the same approach for years – looking at the players’ strengths, their looks and their habits off the field. This conventional wisdom isn’t serving them, though, because the team is doing poorly. So Beane goes out on a limb and hires a recent college graduate, Peter Brand (a composite character based largely on Paul DePodesta), for his ability to think differently. Brand convinces him to stop looking at things like a player’s unsightly throwing style or ugly girlfriend — things that baseball managers had been using for years in making their player decisions. Instead, he only looks at one thing – who gets on base. Getting on base equals runs, and runs equal wins. Though ridiculed by their management team and the press, the A’s go on to win twenty consecutive games – an all-time record in baseball. What does this have to do with yoga? I have seen a very similar thing happen in the yoga community—teachers fixated on a principle before looking at an individual student’s needs. It seems as though the longer one spends immersed in the yoga scene, the more emphatic and rigid their ideas become, especially about alignment. After a while, it seems like some teachers prioritize their ideas and philosophies over actually looking at their students and reading what’s going on in the moment. I love how simply Brand looks at winning baseball: GET ON BASE. To draw an analogy with yoga, the ultimate “win” for a yoga student is to experience that undeniable feeling of connection in their body, mind and spirit. Their ‘bases’ might be things such as: acquiring more flexibility, balancing in handstand, floating in arm balances, or building core strength. We might have to modify a pose or two to ultimately get our students on base, but if it gets them closer to their “win,” does it matter how they got there? If teachers stay rigid about formulaic alignment, students might never get on base. Worse, they will get discouraged and give up. In Moneyball, Peter Brand gets ridiculed for using a methodology that is different and new. And a good yoga teacher runs the same risk by refusing to buy in to the old belief that perfect alignment is the only important thing and should be achievable right off the bat. Certain popular teacher training courses use language like ‘the most difficult certification process’ in order to convince both students and teachers that their style is the best and safest. But these kind of grandiose statements have the unfortunate side effect of producing some strong-minded, ego-based teachers who put the copyrighted style before the student. It’s this sort of mindless rigidity that leads to injuries. I think it’s wonderful (and imperative!) for yoga teachers to study human anatomy and physiology. In my humble opinion, I feel we can never learn enough about the human body. But for a lot of us teachers, this means taking the initiative to seek education outside of our yoga training, or even outside of the world of yoga altogether. Since so many teacher trainings put the emphasis on alignment and tradition over individual bodies, it’s up to us to do the legwork to become better teachers. As teachers, we are in the position of being of service to the student, and ever expanding our knowledge and awareness is one of the best ways of being in utmost service to our students. We have to think like Brand: for ourselves.









